Pecan Grove Volunteer Fire Department

NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS, A True Community Fire Department. Serving Pecan Grove Plantation, Plantation Place and Waterside Estates Subdivisions.

Welcome

Myths & Facts by Resident

Truth Finally Comes Out!

ISO & What PGVFD is doing

Old News & Announcements

FAQ about Fire MUD &PGVFD

PGFD History

Weather And River Alerts

Incidents Numbers & Time

Neighborhood Events/Links

Fire Safety for Kids

Fire Prevention Tips

School Districts

Fire Board

Important Phone Numbers

Poison Prevention Tips

Join The Team

Swimming Pool Safety

July 4th Community Events

FireBall Classic Golf Trn

Five Miles My Way

2011 Five Mile Results

Course Map

Valero & Fire Station Reg

Online Registration

By Mail Registration

test

Myths & Facts produced by a Resident
In an effort to help you determine
what is best for your life and property
as a member of our community, here are
MYTHS and FACTS
to help you make a decision.
 Don’t let myths affect your ability to make an informed decision.
 
MYTH
FACT
·          A notion based more on tradition or convenience than on fact
·          Legend; Folklore; Tradition
·          Unreality
·          Fiction; Story
·          Verifiable
·          In realty; in truth; actually
·          Something known with certainty
·          Something that has been objectively verified
·          Something having real, demonstrable existence

                                                           

Table of Contents
 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….……Page 1
A guide to help you find information that  directly affects you.
Formation of the
Pecan Grove Voluntary Fire Department (PGVFD)…………………….………..Page 2
From the beginning . . .
PGVFD Services…………………………………………………………….……….Page 2
29 years of dedicated service to you
Pecan Grove Municipal District’s (PGMUD)
involvement with the PGVFD…………………………..…………………………..Page 3
Our Community Leaders as Community Partners
The PGVFD Board of Directors……………………………………………………Page 4
The current board-election process and how it evolved.
PGVFD Audit to the PGMUD………………………………………….…....…Pages 4, 5
Community Partners work together.
The Fire Plan……………………………………………………………….....Pages 5, 6, 7
Decide for yourself if one is needed.
The “ISO” & Consultant Mike Pietsch’s Rating Study………….…...………Pages 8, 9
Fire department ratings and how they directly affect you.
PGVFD Fire Station #2 (Waterside Division)………………………………….….Page 9
Does having more equipment & personnel for safety and protection matter to you?
Financial Stability and Viability of the PGVFD………………………………....Page 10
Do you want a Community Partner that is financially sound?
CONCLUSION……………………… The decision is yours…………………………...Page 11
CONTACTS………………For making a difference in your community………………..Pages 11, 12
We hope you find this information informative and compelling, as well as a call to action.
Prepared for and presented to you by your
Concerned Pecan Grove Neighbors
October 2011
Formation of the Pecan Grove Voluntary Fire Department
From the beginning . . .
MYTH
FACT
PGVFD was formed by the
Pecan Grove Municipal Utility District
(PGMUD).
 
In 1982, The Pecan Grove Voluntary Fire Department (PGVFD) was formed by a small group of residents who felt the area deserved its own dedicated fire department.

PGVFD Services

29 years of dedicated service to you
MYTHS
FACTS
PGVFD leaves the
community unprotected.
The Richmond Fire Department will deliver the same or better service.
PGVFD provides dedicated first-priority service
to the Pecan Grove area and Waterside Estates.
PGVFD provides Emergency Medical Services
from Basic Life Support to Advanced Life Support.
In a major incident, PGVFD would not have enough firefighters.
PGVFD handled a month’s worth of incidents in five days
during Hurricane Ike and never missed a call.
PGVFD does not
have enough fire trucks
to cover Pecan Grove.
PGVFD has
  • 2 Rescue/Engine/Tanker Trucks
  • 1 Reserve Tanker Truck
  • 1 Rescue/Booster Fire Truck
PGVFD is limited
by the location
of the fire station
on Pitts Road and
has not provided
adequate service.
PGVFD’s 29 years of service from its Pitts Road location has provided protection for all service areas without a single written complaint but rather many expressions of appreciation from those served.

First-response areas in Waterside and the Pecan Grove POA and the Grove HOA areas north of the intersection of Plantation Drive and Old South Drive will be served by Fire Station #2.
 
PGMUD or the Richmond Fire Department can offer the same services as PGVFD.
PGVFD’s Emergency Notification system by e-mail
alerts all service-area residents
of emergency situations within the neighborhood.

PGMUD’s Involvement with the PGVFD
Our Community Leaders as Community Partners
MYTHS
FACTS

·        The PGMUD has authority over the PGVFD.

 ·          The PGVFD should include PGMUD
in all its decisions.
·         PGVFD is a complete and separate legal entity from the PGMUD.

·         The PGMUD has never had and continues to have no authority or control over the PGVFD.

The PGMUD has the authority and/or responsibility

to provide a Fire Plan.

The PGMUD has no experience
in the area of fire protection and/or emergency medical services
or fire-service contract administration.

The PGVFD continually thwarts the efforts of the PGMUD over the best interests of the District’s residents.

The PGVFD cooperates fully with the PGMUD
whenever and wherever possible
as part of PGVFD’s commitment to be a
good community partner.
The PGMUD should have been involved in the process of choosing a new fire chief.
In January 2008, the PGVFD Board of Directors that included representatives of the homeowners’ associations hired the current Fire Chief, Paul LeDoux.

The PGMUD has no direct involvement with the election process.

Chief LeDoux has been irresponsible, uncooperative and/or unresponsive

to the requests from the PGMUD.

Shortly after being hired, Chief LeDoux met with the PGMUD.

The PGMUD Board of Directors then advised Chief LeDoux to straighten up the PGVFD and get it compliant in every aspect.

Chief LeDoux recognized the need for re-alignment of the fire department to become compliant and did it.
 
The PGVFD Board of Directors
The current board-election process and how it evolved.
MYTHS
FACTS

Representatives of the homeowners’ associations were thrown

off the PGVFD Board.
As early as 2007 through January 2009, the PGVFD Board consisted of representatives from the homeowners’ associations who had been appointed to serve on the PGVFD Board.
 
As laws changed,
so did the need for restructuring of the PGVFD board-election process.

Under the direction of legal counsel, the PGVFD Board (with appointed representatives from each homeowners’ association) voted to bring the board-election process into compliance with the laws of the State of Texas and the IRS Code that require all Board Members be nominated and elected.

Because some of the Board Members
(such as representatives from the homeowners’ associations)
had been appointed, they could no longer serve on the Board unless
nominated and elected.

Representatives of the homeowners’ associations are not allowed to serve on the PGVFD Board.

Anyone from the PGVFD service area
may be nominated to serve
on the PGVFD Board.

PGVFD Audit to the PGMUD
Community Partners work together.
MYTHS
FACTS
PGVFD must provide audits to the PGMUD.
PGVFD is not required to provide audits to the PGMUD but has done so in the interest of being a good community partner.

PGMUD was not provided with a 2006 audit as requested to the PGVFD.

In early 2007 -  PGVFD Fire Chief Larry Perry provided the 2006  audit to the PGMUD as requested.

Joe Taylor (current President of the PGMUD Board of Directors)
approved the procedure used and later approved that audit.

In late 2007 - PGMUD requested a more detailed audit.
 
(This section continued on Page 5.)

(Continued from Page 4))
PGVFD Audit to the PGMUD
Community Partners work together.
MYTHS
FACTS

The PGVFD purposely delayed the audit.

          
The 2007 audit was scheduled to be completed in June 2008.  A draft financial statement was one day away from being delivered when allegations of a cover-up were leveled against the PGVD.
 
During this audit, requests for investigation of wrong doing on the part of the PGVFD were received by the Sheriff’s Office and the District Attorney’s Office.  The audit was delayed until those investigations were completed.

At the conclusion of the investigations, NO cover-up, collusion, or delay on the part of the PGVFD was found.  PGVFD and third-party auditor were cleared of all allegations.
 
PGMUD was advised of the results of the investigations by the District Attorney’s Office.

After a four-month delay due to the investigations,
the third-party auditor delivered the 2007 Financial Statement
(which had required the auditor to review all records from 1982 through 2007
at a cost of $50,000 to the PGVFD).

The PGMUD knew the reason
for the delay in completing the audit.

A copy of the 2007 Audited Financial Statement was provided to the PGMUD.

The Fire Plan

Decide for yourself if one is needed.
MYTHS
FACTS

Representatives of the homeowners’ associations have complete authority and responsibility to protect the property owners.

Elected “leaders” speak for members of their homeowners’ associations.

It is not necessary to ask members of the community for their input.

The homeowners’ associations are entitled to act on behalf
of their respective community areas for chartered issues only.

Whereas, fire protection services fall
outside the homeowner-associations’ responsibilities.

The issue of a Fire Plan
should have been put forth
to the community
for direction.
(This section continued on Page 6.)
(Continued from Page 5)

The Fire Plan

Decide for yourself if one is needed.
MYTHS
FACTS

 

The PGVFD gave no input

for the 10/19/11 meeting

because of indifference.
Richard Stolleis, Chairman of the Fire Plan Committee at the time,  scheduled a meeting of the Committee for October 19, 2011, to review Consultant Pietsch’s Report and Fire Plan Recommendations.

The PGVFD representative had a previous commitment and time constraint that could not be changed.

When asked to reschedule the meeting
for one week, Mr. Stolleis, among others,
refused to reschedule the meeting
to allow a PGVFD representative to attend.

 

At the 10/19/11 meeting,

there was a consensus

among the members

of the Fire Plan Committee

for recommendations

to be presented

to the PGMUD Board.

Without a PGVFD representative at the 10/19/11 Fire Plan Committee Meeting, Chairman Stolleis reviewed Consultant Pietsch’s Rating Study and decided there was a consensus on recommendations to be presented to the PGMUD Board without a single vote of the other members of the Fire Plan Committee.

“Consensus” was not recorded until concern was expressed
at the 10/25/11 PGMUD Meeting.

Joe Taylor (President of the PGMUD Board) then asked members of the Fire Plan MUD Committee who were present if there was a consensus among the Committee; those present agreed to a consensus.
(Three members of the seven-member Committee were not present.)

At the 10/25/11 PGMUD Meeting, Kevin Krahn (PGMUD Board of Director) acknowledged the necessity for input from the PGVFD on the Fire Plan and stated another meeting would be scheduled to ensure PGVFD’s participation.

 

The PGMUD was required to act when requested by representatives of the PGP POA, The HOA CIA, and the Pecan Lakes HOA to do a Fire Plan.

A Fire Plan is essential for the safety and protection of  residents within the PGMUD.

 

PGVFD does not provide

all the necessary services

to serve and protect citizens

within its service area.

A Fire Plan authorized by a rule in the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) allows utility districts to propose and develop a fire-protection plan.

Only voters can approve a Fire Plan.

The PGMUD bypassed due diligence of public meetings
to gauge support of the proposed Fire Plan.

Citizens of the PGMUD have not only fire protection but also emergency medical services and non-emergency assistance through the PGVFD.

PGVFD’s services are not limited in regard to fire protection.
 
(This Section continued on Page 7.)
(Continued from Page 6.)

 
The Fire Plan
Decide for yourself if one is needed.
MYTHS
FACTS

Recommendations

of the Fire Plan Committee presented to the PGMUD Board on 10/25/11 are considered

in the best interests

of the residents of the PGMUDistrict.

 No details were given in the  10/25/11 PGMUD Meeting
as to why the proposed Fire Plan is in the best interests
of the residents of the PGMUDistrict;
only suppositions were mentioned.

Kevin Krahn was requested by a member of the audience to provide specific reasons and detail as to why the proposed recommendations of combining the two fire departments would be the best for the citizens of the PGMUDistrict.
 
Mr. Krahn said those facts would be provided.
Joe Taylor reiterated those facts would be provided as requested.

Mr. Pietsch’s recommendation is

to consolidate the services

of  the PGVFD and

the Richmond Fire Department into one department

for the best interest

of service area residents.

  
The Pietsch 9/28/11 report suggests that the most beneficial fire defense infrastructure for Pecan Grove would include a deployment of fire defense units from PGVFD and the Richmond Fire Department to obtain a
better insurance rating only so far as
structural firefighting services are concerned.

PGVFD already has an Automatic Aid agreement
with the City of Richmond Fire Department
for responding to structural fires and
eliminates the above concern for  structural firefighting ability.

PGVFD is a non-profit  501(c)3 entity
while the City of Richmond is a legal-taxing authority.

Attempting to consolidate the two fire departments will be the
demise of the PGVFD and
that is the intent of the PGMUD Board of Directors.
This action will leave the Pecan Grove residents
with no input of how they are protected.

Voting for the Fire Plan is a vote for better fire protection.

As recommended in the Fire Plan Committee’s memo of 10/19/11
to the PGMUD Board,
a vote for the Fire Plan would be a vote
for the City of Richmond and its fire department..
 

Mr. Stolleis

had no conflict

when the

PGMUD Board appointed him

to the Fire Plan Committee.

After several Pecan Grove residents complained about PGMUD Director
and Fire Plan Committee Chairman Richard Stolleis’s conflict of interest
because of his direct ties to the City of Richmond,
 
Mr. Stolleis stepped down
from the Fire Plan Committee and
recused himself from any votes or discussions relating
to the City of Richmond issues.

 
“ISO”
Insurance Services Office, Inc.
 Public Protection Classification (PPC)
Points within this classification determine the ISO rating.
Quoting Consultant Mike Pietsch’s 9/28/11 Rating Study to the PGMUD:
An ISO “help(s) establish appropriate fire insurance premiums for residential…properties….”  (Emphasis added.).
Fire department ratings and how they directly affect you.
MYTHS
FACTS

An ISO Report

(or recommendation for an ISO grading) indicates which department could best serve

the PGMUDistrict residents

for fire and emergency services.
An official ISO report is based
on a fire department’s ability
to fight structure fires ONLY.

 An ISO report does not take into account other services a department provides,  such as Emergency Medical Calls, detection through removal of Hazardous Materials (HAZMat), or response to grass fires.

 From January through September 2011:
Calls to PGVFD were
2.64% for STRUCTURE FIRES
compared to
55.95% for EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

Other calls to PGVFD within that same time period were:
·          10.02%      Other Fire Calls
·          8.50%        HAZMat Calls
·          12.28%      Service Calls
·          2.45%        Good Intent Calls
·          8.12%        False Alarm Calls

An ISO report does not take into account the quality of the service.

Mr. Pietsch’s 9/28/11 report is an “ISO Report” and will change the PGMUD ISO rating to a 4,

causing everyone’s insurance to go up immediately unless the PGMUD changes fire departments.

This report should be used as

the sole basis for making

an immediate change.

An ISO re-survey has not been requested
for the PGVFD service area since 2006.

Consultant Pietsch’s 9/28/11 Rating Study
does not change PGVFD’s current ISO Rating of 3.
Changing the rating can only be done
by an ISO representative doing a
 Public Protection Classification Survey
at the request of the PGVFD
or at the end of 10 years.

Consultant Pietsch’s 9/28/11 Rating Study is NOT an ISO Report (please see page 15 of his report that can be found on-line at www.pecangrovemud.com) but rather a rating study for “Evaluating Fire Defense Infrastructure (Optimizing ISO Public Protection Classification)” in preparation for requesting an ISO re-survey.
 (This Section continued on Page 9.)
(Continued from Page 8.)

“ISO”

Fire department ratings and how they directly affect you.

PGVFD’s

new fire station and new fire truck

do not improve the PGVFD services  or make a difference in the

“ISO rating” from Mr. Pietsch

for PGMUD residents.

Consultant Pietsch’s 9/28/11 Rating Study did NOT consider the new Fire Station #2 and new fire truck.

Construction and location of Fire Station #2 and the new fire truck were recommendations in the 2006 ISO Official PPC Survey.

PGVFD asked Consultant Pietsch for a “what if” answer for adding the new fire station and new fire truck.  According to Consultant Pietsch, that scenario would give PGVFD an unofficial ISO rating of 3
.
Adding in possible additional points for the improved 911 system upgrades and a margin of error for the type of  conservative rating study Mr. Pietsch does, an
ISO rating for PGVFD of 2 is expected.

An ISO rating is used

by all insurance companies

to determine a homeowner’s insurance rate and directly affects the cost of your fire insurance.

An ISO rating MAY or MAY NOT be used
by your insurance company to determine your premium.
Check with your insurance company.
There are many factors that determine how much
you pay for insurance.

PGVFD Fire Station #2 (Waterside Division)

Does having more equipment & personnel for safety and protection matter to you?
MYTHS
FACTS

Elected “leaders”

do not know why

Fire Station #2

is being built.

 
In 2005, Consultant Pietsch was hired by PGVFD and recommended adding a second station in the vicinity of Farmer Road and Oyster Creek to lower response times to the HOA and POA sections of Pecan Grove in addition to Waterside Estates.

Fire Station #2

was built to serve

Waterside Estates.

  
The PGVFD Service Area for Fire Station #2 includes first-response areas in Waterside Estates and in the Pecan Grove POA and The Grove HOA areas north of the intersection of Plantation Drive and Old South Drive.
 
Fire Station #2 will respond to all structure fire calls.

The community may be responsible for the debt incurred by PGVFD to build Fire Station #2.

In the Fire Plan Committee’s “Review of Pietsch Report and Fire Plan Recommendations” to the PGMUD Board on 10/19/11, it states:

“It is unknown how the VFD plans to pay for the expense (of Fire Station #2) and concern was expressed that the community should not be responsible for that debt.”

The community is NOT responsible for PGVFD’s debt.
**NOTE:  The Community is responsible for the PGMUD debt.

Financial Stability and Viability of the PGVFD
Do you want a Community Partner that is financially sound?
MYTHS
FACTS

A Fire Plan is necessary

to guarantee funds

for the operation of and improvements of the PGVFD.

                Continual improvements of the PGVFD have been done without the need for
·         A mandatory Fire Service fee
·         An increase in the Voluntary Donation rate of $7.00 per household
·         A District Fire Plan
·         Money being paid to the City of Richmond.

PGVFD

needs a Fire Plan

to guarantee revenue

for its operations.

PGVFD’s primary source of funding is from voluntary tax-deductible donations.  PGVFD directly mails requests for donations to Pecan Grove residents.

The Waterside HOA collects donations through Fort Bend MUD #118 water bill.

Funding is received by PGVFD from
  • Fund-raising events throughout the year (such as the Golf Tournament and Five Miles My Way);
  • Reimbursements from Ft. Bend County; and
  • Through PGVFD’s very aggressive grant system,  PGVFD identifies multiple sources and writes grants to those sources.  In the past 24 months, the PGVFD has received over $300,000 in grants.
No property-tax funds are received by PGVFD.

PGVFD is “sneaky” and withholds important information.

PGVFD is transparent in its operations.

PGVFD is audited yearly.

Anyone can get a copy of PGVFD’s
·         Financial Statements,
·         By-Laws,
·         Articles of Incorporation,
·         Guidelines, and
·         Any other documents that are not covered by the privacy laws of the State of Texas or the United States.

PGFVD has regularly scheduled meetings that are open to District residents.
 
CONCLUSION
Is it’s not broke, why the attempt to “fix” it?
The decision is yours.
If you agree that the very best protection
for you, your property, and your life
is to continue as first priority with the services of the
Pecan Grove Volunteer Fire Department,
let your voice be heard.
We can stop this nonsense!
Let the PGMUD and the Fire Plan Committee
know how you feel.
 
Pecan Grove Municipal Utility District (PGMUD)
2035 FM359, Suite 13
Richmond, TX  77406
www.pecangrovemud.com
Board of Directors
    Joe Taylor              President
    Richard Stolleis     Vice President
    Buddy Kluppel       Secretary
    John Minchew       Assistant Secretary/Asst VP
    Kevin Krahn          Assistant Secretary/Asst VP
PGMUD Attorney
Lynne B. Humphries Partner
Allen Boone Humphries Robinson LLP
3200 Southwest Freeway, Suite 2600
Houston, TX  77027
Office:  713/860-6406
Fax:  713/860-6606
lhumphries@abhr.com
  “ISO Report”
can be found on PGMUD’s website.
Fire Plan Committee
 Kevin Krahn, PGMUD Director
& Committee Chairman
Marc Bateman, The Grove CIA
Joe Dombrowski, The Grove HOA
Angela George, Pecan Lakes HOA
Fred Ross – Pecan Grove Plantation POA
William Jacks, PGVFD Board President
Chief Mike Youngblood, City of Richmond
NOTE:
*  Richard Stolleis, PGMUD Board of Directors,
    resigned from and recused himself from the
    Committee.
*  Conley Shepherd, Pecan Lakes HOA, was
    not only removed from the Committee and
    replaced by Angela George but was also
    removed from his position in the Pecan Lakes
    HOA.
*  John Minchew, PGMUD Board of Directors,
    resigned from the Committee and was replaced
    by Kevin Krhan.
“Review of Pietsch Report and Fire Plan Recommendations”
dated 10/19/11 to the PGMUD Directors that was presented at the 10/25/11 PGMUD Meeting may be requested from the
Fire Plan Committee.
 
(Contact information continued on Page 12.)

(Contact Information continued from Page 11.)
If you would like to let the leaders of your homeowner’s association know how you feel,
here is their contact information.
Pecan Grove Plantation
Property Owners’ Association (PGP POA)
1421 FM 359, Suite K
Richmond, TX  77406
Office:  281/344-9496
Fax:  281/239-7000
E-mail:  pgpoa@peoplepc.com
Web Site:  www.pecangrove.o
 Board of Trustees & Officers
Jim Ashmore             President
Frank Jarrett             Vice President
Rachael Buckfield      Secretary
Fred Ross                    Treasurer
Cheryl Minchew         Board Member
Katherine Myers        Board Member
John Clark                  Board Member                       
The Grove CIA
 contactus@thegrovecia.org
 
The Grove HOA
 http://thegrovehoa.org
 Angela Connell
713/776-1771
 
       You can also put your name on a petition opposing the Fire Plan
Contact the PGVFD directly to have your name added
to the petition opposing the Fire Plan.
  Pecan Grove Volunteer Fire Department
727 Pitts Road - Richmond, TX  77406
www.pecangrovefd.org
pgfd@live.com
Chief Paul LeDoux – 281/341-6677

727 Pitts Road  Richmond, Texas 77406
All Rights Reserved Pecan Grove Fire Department 1982-2011
No images, content, media or any part of this site may be used without written permission from PGFD.